Open
Conversation
I have made minor editorial changes (wording). I have also emphasized the impact the determination of t_0 has on particle ID. The main change is where Rayleigh scattering in LAr is described: I introduced a more realistic Rayleigh scattering length (the original text quotes 95cm which is a theoretical estimate contradicted by the only experimental result available so far and also in conflict with a more recent estimation which I have announced to the PD group) The shorter Rayleigh scattering length impacts on the absorption length so I removed the greater than 200 cm and left of the order of 200 cm (see Criag Thorn docdb 6302-v2).
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I have made minor editorial changes (wording). I have also emphasized the impact the determination of t_0 has on particle ID. The main change is where Rayleigh scattering in LAr is described: I introduced a more realistic Rayleigh scattering length (the original text quotes 95cm which is a theoretical estimate contradicted by the only experimental result available so far and also in conflict with a more recent estimation which I have announced to the PD group) The shorter Rayleigh scattering length impacts on the absorption length so I removed the greater than 200 cm and left of the order of 200 cm (see Criag Thorn docdb 6302-v2).