Skip to content

Updated duplicate device names to use PVs to identify#200

Merged
tomkane-dls merged 1 commit intomainfrom
displayname-pvs
Feb 2, 2026
Merged

Updated duplicate device names to use PVs to identify#200
tomkane-dls merged 1 commit intomainfrom
displayname-pvs

Conversation

@tomkane-dls
Copy link
Collaborator

Duplicate device names now append PV names in brackets instead of enumerating. If no P macro is present they will display (NO PV NAME {i}) so there is no chance of a clash.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 30, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 89.78%. Comparing base (cecc500) to head (c126e2e).
⚠️ Report is 6 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #200      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   89.75%   89.78%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files           9        9              
  Lines         800      803       +3     
==========================================
+ Hits          718      721       +3     
  Misses         82       82              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@tomkane-dls tomkane-dls merged commit e9c209d into main Feb 2, 2026
8 checks passed
@tomkane-dls tomkane-dls deleted the displayname-pvs branch February 2, 2026 09:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants