Feat(storage): add bucket encryption enforcement#2190
Feat(storage): add bucket encryption enforcement#2190thiyaguk09 wants to merge 2 commits intoGoogleCloudPlatform:mainfrom
Conversation
Adds metadata support for the following encryption enforcement fields: - googleManagedEncryptionEnforcementConfig - customerManagedEncryptionEnforcementConfig - customerSuppliedEncryptionEnforcementConfig
|
Here is the summary of changes. You are about to add 3 region tags.
This comment is generated by snippet-bot.
|
Summary of ChangesHello @thiyaguk09, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request introduces robust capabilities for managing encryption enforcement on Google Cloud Storage buckets. It provides developers with tools to programmatically retrieve existing encryption policies, apply new enforcement rules (such as mandating Customer Managed Encryption Keys), and remove previously configured policies. This enhancement improves data security and compliance by offering granular control over how data is encrypted at rest within buckets. Highlights
Changelog
Activity
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request adds functionality and corresponding samples for managing bucket encryption enforcement configurations. The changes include new scripts for setting, getting, and removing these configurations, along with integration tests. The implementation of the core functionality is clear and correct. My review focuses on improving the new tests for better robustness and maintainability. I've suggested making test assertions more specific and refactoring duplicated code in the test suite.
| /** @depends testEnableDefaultKmsKey */ | ||
| public function testSetBucketEncryptionEnforcementConfig() | ||
| { | ||
| $kmsEncryptedBucketName = self::$bucketName . '-kms-encrypted'; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The variable $kmsEncryptedBucketName is redefined with the same value in testSetBucketEncryptionEnforcementConfig, testGetBucketEncryptionEnforcementConfig, and testRemoveAllBucketEncryptionEnforcementConfig. To avoid repetition and improve maintainability, consider defining it as a private static property of the class and initializing it in setUpBeforeClass.
| $this->assertStringContainsString('Google Managed (GMEK) Enforcement:', $output); | ||
| $this->assertStringContainsString('Mode: FullyRestricted', $output); | ||
| $this->assertStringContainsString('Customer Managed (CMEK) Enforcement:', $output); | ||
| $this->assertStringContainsString('Mode: NotRestricted', $output); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This test is missing a check for the 'Customer Supplied (CSEK) Enforcement' configuration, which is set in set_bucket_encryption_enforcement_config. Please add an assertion for it.
Additionally, the current assertions using assertStringContainsString are not specific enough to verify that the correct mode is associated with the correct enforcement type. For more robust testing, you could consider using assertMatchesRegularExpression to verify that the mode is correctly associated with its enforcement policy.
$this->assertStringContainsString('Google Managed (GMEK) Enforcement:', $output);
$this->assertStringContainsString('Mode: FullyRestricted', $output);
$this->assertStringContainsString('Customer Managed (CMEK) Enforcement:', $output);
$this->assertStringContainsString('Mode: NotRestricted', $output);
$this->assertStringContainsString('Customer Supplied (CSEK) Enforcement:', $output);
Adds metadata support for the following encryption enforcement fields: