Skip to content

Comments

AppFic Followup MR#168

Open
rvazarkar wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
appfic-followup
Open

AppFic Followup MR#168
rvazarkar wants to merge 2 commits intomainfrom
appfic-followup

Conversation

@rvazarkar
Copy link
Contributor

@rvazarkar rvazarkar commented Feb 20, 2026

Added missing data for AppFICs

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new public data representation for federated identity credentials with JSON-serializable fields: audiences, id, issuer, name, subject, and description.
    • Exposes structured identity metadata to downstream features and integrations without altering existing behavior.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 20, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉


Walkthrough

A new public data structure FICData was added to the models package with fields Audiences, ID, Issuer, Name, Subject, and Description, each annotated with JSON tags for serialization.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
FIC Data Model
models/app-fic.go
Adds exported FICData struct with fields: Audiences []string, ID string, Issuer string, Name string, Subject string, Description string (all with JSON tags).

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A tiny struct hops into place,
Audiences, ID, and Issuer trace,
Name and Subject join the run,
Description tucked beneath the sun,
JSON-ready, our work is done. 🥕

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'AppFic Followup MR' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive abbreviations without conveying the specific change (adding FICData struct with description field). Consider a more descriptive title like 'Add FICData struct with audience, issuer, and description fields' to clearly communicate the primary change.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (stacked PR)
  • 📝 Generate docstrings (commit on current branch)
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch appfic-followup

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant