added Support for RSL866T

[aeinstein]

Hi, I redo the implementation with backward compatibility (minimum changes to your structure).
I can't test the default RSL remote, cause I don't have one.
Tested:

• autocreate for RSL866T remotecontrol
• manual create
• state change
  Module is in use in our SmartHome

[sidey79]

I'll try to get some testdata so that we can verify the behaviour.

[sidey79]

@aeinstein

I got some reference data and generated tests out of them.

I think there is a change in on/off code calculation which leads to serval test failures.

Some other tests are failing, because channel is now optional which wasn't before, so we need to adapt those tests a little bit.

[aeinstein]

Hi, sorry for long waiting:
yes I changed the output from open/close to on/off because its more general and my Lamps don't have Open/Close ;-)
What should we do? Make it backward compatible ? Or can we change the behavior on different type settings?

[sidey79]

Hi, sorry for long waiting: yes I changed the output from open/close to on/off because its more general and my Lamps don't have Open/Close ;-) What should we do? Make it backward compatible ? Or can we change the behavior on different type settings?

I think the on/open off/close thing isn't the main issue.
There are other things, which causes the test failures.