Update Rust crate syn to v2.0.117

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Type	Update	Change
syn	workspace.dependencies	patch	2.0.114 -> 2.0.117

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

---

Release Notes

dtolnay/syn (syn)

v2.0.117

Compare Source

• Fix parsing of self:: pattern in first function argument (#​1970)

v2.0.116

Compare Source

• Optimize parse_fn_arg_or_variadic for less lookahead on erroneous receiver (#​1968)

v2.0.115

Compare Source

• Enable GenericArgument::Constraint parsing in non-full mode (#​1966)

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am every weekday,every weekend" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 26, 2026 0:40am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 26, 2026 0:40am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 26, 2026 0:40am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 26, 2026 0:40am

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 62.60%. Comparing base (bc6e591) to head (a537e67).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #8483   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   62.59%   62.60%           
=======================================
  Files        1296     1296           
  Lines      131048   131038   -10     
  Branches     5488     5487    -1     
=======================================
- Hits        82032    82030    -2     
+ Misses      48106    48098    -8     
  Partials      910      910           

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.78% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.16% <ø> (-0.04%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.86% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	27.44% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.86% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.32% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.11% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	91.78% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 65 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

---

_{Comparing deps/rs/syn-2.x-lockfile (a537e67) with main (d61285e)}

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Lockfile-only patch update to a widely used parsing crate; primary risk is build/derive macro incompatibility regressions rather than behavioral changes at runtime.

Overview
Updates the Rust dependency lockfile to use syn 2.0.117 (from 2.0.114), cascading the new syn patch version through all proc-macro crates that depend on it.

No application/runtime code changes are included; this is a dependency/lockfile-only refresh.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit a537e67. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Bumps the Rust workspace dependency syn from 2.0.114 to 2.0.117 (Renovate-generated), updating the lockfile accordingly.

Changes:

• Updates syn to v2.0.117 (patch-level upgrade)
• Refreshes Cargo.lock to reflect the new resolved dependency graph

Technical Notes:

• Includes upstream parsing correctness fix for self:: patterns in the first function argument
• Includes an upstream optimization in parse_fn_arg_or_variadic for erroneous receivers
• Enables GenericArgument::Constraint parsing in non-full mode (per upstream)

Considerations: Since syn is widely used in procedural macros, verifying CI and any macro-heavy crates in the workspace is the main risk surface.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 174 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.273 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 322 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.664 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 162 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.410 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$29.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 161 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.01 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.90 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.307 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$13.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.738 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 28.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.414 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.15 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.251 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.49 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.770 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.38 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.238 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.73 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.877 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 29.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.608 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.771 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.62 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.26 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.35 \mathrm{ms} \pm 39.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.86 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.903 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.96 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.582 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.18 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.010 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.122 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.890 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.731 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.93 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.667 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.12 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.693 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.493 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.20 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.907 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.47 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.129 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.57 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.152 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.50 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.335 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$42.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 190 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.119 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$78.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 403 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.539 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$45.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 212 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.565 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$48.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 260 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.636 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$57.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 279 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.103 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$43.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 184 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.053 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$422 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.07 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-0.818 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$98.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 504 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.308 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$87.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.619 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$316 \mathrm{ms} \pm 908 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.09 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 81.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.564 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.736 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.343 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.95 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.276 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 92.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.333 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 93.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.158 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$17.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 99.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.51 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 182 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.637 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$32.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 268 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.67 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 278 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.871 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$30.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 342 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.111 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$30.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 259 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.256 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$31.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 290 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$30.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 276 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.404 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$31.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.920 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 272 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$8.78 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.604 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$89.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 398 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.596 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$145 \mathrm{ms} \pm 581 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.094 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$96.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 432 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.489 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.164 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 464 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.861 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$88.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 433 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.858 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$116 \mathrm{ms} \pm 456 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.516 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$95.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 532 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.593 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$104 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.043 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 465 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$105 \mathrm{ms} \pm 410 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.339 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$135 \mathrm{ms} \pm 691 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.217 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 711 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.352 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 737 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-14.967 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$610 \mathrm{ms} \pm 4.16 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-2.851 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph