Update npm package fast-xml-parser to v5.3.8 [SECURITY]

[hash-worker]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Confidence
fast-xml-parser	5.3.6 -> 5.3.8

---

Warning

Some dependencies could not be looked up. Check the Dependency Dashboard for more information.

GitHub Vulnerability Alerts

CVE-2026-27942

Impact

Application crashes with stack overflow when user use XML builder with prserveOrder:true for following or similar input:

[{
    'foo': [
        { 'bar': [{ '@​_V': 'baz' }] }
    ]
}]

Cause: arrToStr was not validating if the input is an array or a string and treating all non-array values as text content.
What kind of vulnerability is it? Who is impacted?

Patches

Yes, in 5.3.8.

Workarounds

Use XML builder with preserveOrder:false or check the input data before passing to builder.

References

Are there any links users can visit to find out more?

---

Release Notes

NaturalIntelligence/fast-xml-parser (fast-xml-parser)

v5.3.8: handle non-array input for XML builder && support maxNestedTags

Compare Source

• support maxNestedTags
• handle non-array input for XML builder when preserveOrder is true (By Angelo Coetzee)
• save use of js properies
  Full Changelog: NaturalIntelligence/fast-xml-parser@v5.3.7...v5.3.8

v5.3.7: CJS typing fix

Compare Source

What's Changed

• Unexport X2jOptions at declaration site by @​Drarig29 in #​787

New Contributors

• @​Drarig29 made their first contribution in #​787

Full Changelog: NaturalIntelligence/fast-xml-parser@v5.3.6...v5.3.7

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "" (UTC), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Enabled.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR has been generated by Renovate Bot.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Error		Feb 27, 2026 9:55am
hashdotdesign	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 27, 2026 9:55am
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 27, 2026 9:55am
petrinaut	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 27, 2026 9:55am

[cursor]

PR Summary

Low Risk
Low risk dependency bump limited to lockfile/resolution changes; potential risk is minor behavior changes in XML parsing/building affecting callers at runtime.

Overview
Updates the fast-xml-parser dependency from 5.3.6 to 5.3.8 via root package.json resolutions and the corresponding yarn.lock entry (including checksum changes).

This is a security-focused patch upgrade intended to pick up upstream fixes in fast-xml-parser.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 7280097. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

[augmentcode]

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: Updates fast-xml-parser from 5.3.6 to 5.3.8 to pick up the patch for a stack-overflow crash in the XML builder when preserveOrder: true.

Changes: Bumps the dependency version in package.json (with a corresponding lockfile update).

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

[augmentcode]

Review completed. No suggestions at this time.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.03%. Comparing base (c0e44b8) to head (7280097).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8492      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   62.67%   63.03%   +0.35%     
==========================================
  Files        1302     1302              
  Lines      131635   132960    +1325     
  Branches     5487     5509      +22     
==========================================
+ Hits        82507    83808    +1301     
- Misses      48220    48238      +18     
- Partials      908      914       +6     

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	1.40% <ø> (ø)
apps.hash-api	0.00% <ø> (ø)
blockprotocol.type-system	40.84% <ø> (ø)
local.claude-hooks	0.00% <ø> (ø)
local.harpc-client	51.24% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-graph-sdk	7.73% <ø> (ø)
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.antsi	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.error-stack	90.88% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-codec	84.70% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-net	96.14% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
rust.harpc-tower	66.80% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.harpc-wire-protocol	92.23% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-codec	72.76% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-api	2.85% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-authorization	62.34% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	27.48% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-store	37.86% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-temporal-versioning	47.95% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-types	0.00% <ø> (ø)
rust.hash-graph-validation	83.45% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-ast	87.25% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-compiletest	29.69% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-core	82.26% <ø> (-0.03%)	⬇️
rust.hashql-diagnostics	72.43% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-eval	69.13% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-hir	89.11% <ø> (ø)
rust.hashql-mir	92.43% <ø> (+0.37%)	⬆️
rust.hashql-syntax-jexpr	94.05% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[codspeed-hq]

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 68 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

---

_{Comparing deps/js/npm-fast-xml-parser-vulnerability (7280097) with main (c0e44b8)}

Footnotes

1. 12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩

[github-actions]

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$27.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 227 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.28 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.68 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.891 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$44.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 242 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.259 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 116 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.698 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$25.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 201 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-6.191 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$28.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 158 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.321 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.532 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$3.97 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.501 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.733 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.56 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.157 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$5.39 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.88 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.361 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 37.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.181 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.581 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.30 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.215 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.94 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.100 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 10.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.381 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$3.05 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.32 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.10 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.063 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.373 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.29 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.03 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.188 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 17.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.46 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.75 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.971 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.37 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.319 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 25.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.17 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.67 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.672 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 12.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.822 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.58 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$43.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 235 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.028 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$81.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 379 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.93 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 367 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$51.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 361 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.58 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$60.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 349 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.984 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$44.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 179 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.386 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$415 \mathrm{ms} \pm 913 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.14 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$98.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 435 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.713 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$81.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 378 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.207 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$317 \mathrm{ms} \pm 865 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 69.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.056 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 108 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.16 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.996 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 86.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.62 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$18.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 132 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.427 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 111 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.12 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 55.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.089 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 80.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.980 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$16.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 85.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.789 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 172 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.925 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 241 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.485 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1	$$36.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 307 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1	$$31.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 297 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.401 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1	$$31.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 277 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2	$$34.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 287 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.74 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1	$$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 274 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.34 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1	$$32.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 267 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.592 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 289 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1	$$32.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 293 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba	$$11.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 72.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}27.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$106 \mathrm{ms} \pm 405 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}17.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$176 \mathrm{ms} \pm 748 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$115 \mathrm{ms} \pm 494 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.3 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 569 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 538 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}20.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$148 \mathrm{ms} \pm 624 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}21.5 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$99.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 631 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}9.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$134 \mathrm{ms} \pm 499 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}13.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$107 \mathrm{ms} \pm 540 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}11.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$120 \mathrm{ms} \pm 583 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.0 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$123 \mathrm{ms} \pm 570 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}15.1 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$122 \mathrm{ms} \pm 523 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}14.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$139 \mathrm{ms} \pm 420 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.376 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 447 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.434 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 431 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}23.6 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$609 \mathrm{ms} \pm 3.22 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}0.844 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph