BE-311: Implement entity deletion with multi-level scoping and provenance by TimDiekmann · Pull Request #8494 · hashintel/hash

TimDiekmann · 2026-02-27T15:00:42Z

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

Implements filter-based entity deletion for the graph store with two scopes (Purge and Erase), draft/published partitioning, link constraint validation, temporal provenance, and concurrency-safe locking.

🔗 Related links

BE-311 (internal)

🔍 What does this change?

Core API

DeleteEntitiesParams accepts a Filter<Entity>, DeletionScope, LinkDeletionBehavior, optional decision_time, and include_drafts
Purge scope tombstones entity_ids with EntityDeletionProvenance (soft delete)
Erase scope removes entity_ids entirely (hard delete, no trace)
Entities matched by filter are partitioned into full targets vs draft-only targets via select_entities_for_deletion + promote_draft_only_entities
Satellite tables deleted in FK-safe order: entity_is_of_type → entity_embeddings → entity_temporal_metadata → entity_editions → entity_drafts → entity_edge → entity_ids

Concurrency safety

collect_entity_edition_ids acquires FOR UPDATE on entity_temporal_metadata, serializing with concurrent patch_entity (which uses FOR NO KEY UPDATE NOWAIT)
lock_entity_ids_for_erase acquires FOR UPDATE on entity_ids (erase only), blocking concurrent link creation via FK KEY SHARE conflict
All deletion methods bound to PostgresStore<Transaction<'_>> — enforced at the type level

Error variants

DeletionError::InvalidDecisionTime — decision time exceeds transaction time
DeletionError::IncomingLinksExist — incoming links block deletion
DeletionError::InconsistentEntityIds — entity_ids row count mismatch
DeletionError::Store — generic database failure

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

This PR:

does not modify any publishable blocks or libraries, or modifications do not need publishing

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

The changes in this PR:

are internal and do not require a docs change

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

The changes in this PR:

do not affect the execution graph

🛡 What tests cover this?

53 integration tests across 5 modules:

purge (20): basic deletion, history, batches, cross-web, drafts, tombstone provenance, archived entities, filter-by-type, large batch
erase (7): entity_ids removal, satellite cleanup, history, double-deletion, UUID reuse, promoted draft-only, partial draft preservation
links (12): incoming link blocking, cascade behavior, self-referential batches, erase-specific link handling
drafts (9): draft-only deletion, promotion logic, mixed targets, partial matches
validation (5): decision_time guards, past/future/default timestamps, temporal edition coverage

❓ How to test this?

cargo test --package hash-graph-postgres-store --test deletion
Confirm 53/53 tests pass

🐾 Next steps

Authorization check via PolicyComponents (TODO in delete_entities)
Consider ON DELETE CASCADE on entity_editions FKs to simplify satellite cleanup for erase scope

…ance

vercel · 2026-02-27T15:00:48Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hash	Ready	Preview, Comment	Feb 28, 2026 2:01pm
petrinaut	Error	Comment	Feb 28, 2026 2:01pm

2 Skipped Deployments

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
hashdotdesign	Ignored	Preview	Feb 28, 2026 2:01pm
hashdotdesign-tokens	Ignored	Preview	Feb 28, 2026 2:01pm

cursor · 2026-02-27T15:01:08Z

PR Summary

Medium Risk
Adds new deletion paths that physically remove entity records/edges and can erase entity_ids, so mistakes could cause data loss or FK/locking issues under concurrency despite extensive test coverage.

Overview
Implements a new filter-based entity deletion API (delete_entities) with scopes: Purge (delete all entity satellite data but keep an entity_ids tombstone) and Erase (fully remove entity_ids as well), plus include_drafts handling and a DeletionSummary response.

Adds Postgres-backed deletion execution that partitions matches into full vs draft-only targets, deletes dependent tables in FK-safe order, validates incoming-link constraints (based on LinkDeletionBehavior / scope), and uses transaction-scoped locks to serialize with concurrent patches and link creation.

Extends entity provenance with optional flattened EntityDeletionProvenance (including OpenAPI/TypeScript schema fixes), updates generated openapi.json, and adds a large integration test suite covering purge/erase/drafts/links/temporal validation plus shared DB test utilities and dependencies.

^{Written by Cursor Bugbot for commit 46a1015. This will update automatically on new commits. Configure here.}

codecov · 2026-02-27T15:04:45Z

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 0% with 490 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 62.80%. Comparing base (ef314c5) to head (46a1015).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
...tore/src/store/postgres/knowledge/entity/delete.rs	0.00%	483 Missing ⚠️
...s-store/src/store/postgres/knowledge/entity/mod.rs	0.00%	7 Missing ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8494      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   63.03%   62.80%   -0.23%     
==========================================
  Files        1302     1303       +1     
  Lines      132960   133446     +486     
  Branches     5509     5509              
==========================================
+ Hits        83808    83811       +3     
- Misses      48238    48721     +483     
  Partials      914      914

Flag	Coverage Δ
apps.hash-ai-worker-ts	`1.40% <ø> (ø)`
apps.hash-api	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-graph-sdk	`7.73% <ø> (ø)`
local.hash-isomorphic-utils	`0.00% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-api	`2.85% <ø> (ø)`
rust.hash-graph-postgres-store	`26.69% <0.00%> (-0.79%)`	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

augmentcode · 2026-02-27T15:06:22Z

🤖 Augment PR Summary

Summary: This PR adds filter-based entity deletion to the Postgres graph store, supporting both soft deletion (tombstone) and hard deletion (erase), with draft-aware behavior and provenance stamping.

Changes:

Introduced `DeletionScope`, `LinkDeletionBehavior`, `DeleteEntitiesParams`, and `DeletionSummary` in the store API.
Added `EntityDeletionProvenance` and extended `InferredEntityProvenance` to optionally include deletion actor + timestamps.
Implemented transactional deletion logic in the Postgres store, including FK-safe satellite table cleanup and optional removal of `entity_ids` (erase).
Added link-constraint validation (incoming link counting) and erase-specific locking on `entity_ids` to avoid TOCTOU FK violations.
Added extensive Postgres integration tests covering purge/erase semantics, links, drafts, and decision-time validation.
Refactored test DB setup into a shared wrapper and renamed the “delete all entities” helper.

Technical Notes: Uses row-level locks (FOR UPDATE) on entity_temporal_metadata (to serialize with concurrent patches) and on entity_ids for erase scope (to serialize with concurrent edge inserts), and merges deletion provenance into entity_ids.provenance JSONB for tombstones.

_{🤖 Was this summary useful? React with 👍 or 👎}

augmentcode

Review completed. 3 suggestions posted.

Comment augment review to trigger a new review at any time.

libs/@local/graph/postgres-store/src/store/postgres/knowledge/entity/delete.rs

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json

libs/@local/graph/postgres-store/tests/deletion/purge.rs

codspeed-hq · 2026-02-27T15:06:41Z

Merging this PR will not alter performance

✅ 68 untouched benchmarks
🗄️ 12 archived benchmarks run¹

_{Comparing t/be-311-implement-deletion-for-entities (46a1015) with main (ef314c5)²}

12 benchmarks were run, but are now archived. If they were deleted in another branch, consider rebasing to remove them from the report. Instead if they were added back, click here to restore them. ↩
No successful run was found on main (e4abbb9) during the generation of this report, so ef314c5 was used instead as the comparison base. There might be some changes unrelated to this pull request in this report. ↩

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json

…eduplicate draft IDs - Bound deletion impl to `PostgresStore<Transaction<'_>>` to enforce transactional locking at the type level - Add `FOR UPDATE` to `collect_entity_edition_ids` to serialize with concurrent `patch_entity` calls (`FOR NO KEY UPDATE NOWAIT` conflict) - Keep `lock_entity_ids_for_erase` for concurrent link creation (erase only) - Register `EntityDeletionProvenance` in OpenAPI schema components - Deduplicate draft IDs in `select_entities_for_deletion` to prevent inflated `DeletionSummary.draft_deletions` counts from join duplicates - Unify SQL string indentation

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json

- Manual `ToSchema` impl for `InferredEntityProvenance` so utoipa correctly represents flattened `Option<EntityDeletionProvenance>` fields as optional instead of required. - tsify patch module to generate a clean `interface` instead of a complex type alias (`& (EntityDeletionProvenance | {})`) that breaks `extends` in `EntityProvenance`. - Use `DISTINCT ON` in `select_entities_for_deletion` via `SelectCompiler::add_distinct_selection_with_ordering` instead of manual draft ID deduplication.

code

cursor

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes and found 1 potential issue.

^{Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

libs/@blockprotocol/type-system/rust/src/knowledge/entity/provenance.rs

serde does not support deny_unknown_fields in combination with flatten. The nested flatten chain (EntityProvenance → InferredEntity Provenance → EntityDeletionProvenance) caused "unknown field createdById" during snapshot restore deserialization.

github-actions · 2026-02-28T15:02:44Z

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2002	$$28.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 171 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.60 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.193 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1001	$$13.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 79.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-4.185 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 3314	$$46.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 383 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.327 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 151 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 1526	$$26.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 226 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.40 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 2078	$$30.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 189 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$4.00 \mathrm{ms} \pm 27.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.33 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 1033	$$15.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 110 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.842 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_medium

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 102	$$4.21 \mathrm{ms} \pm 38.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.04 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.59 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}10.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 51	$$3.72 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.8 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.31 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 269	$$6.64 \mathrm{ms} \pm 57.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}19.9 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.91 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 107	$$4.51 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.064 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 133	$$4.83 \mathrm{ms} \pm 45.3 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.607 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 34.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 63	$$4.44 \mathrm{ms} \pm 32.1 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.15 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_none

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 2	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.131 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$2.89 \mathrm{ms} \pm 15.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.934 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 1	$$2.98 \mathrm{ms} \pm 13.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.855 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 8	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.796 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.04 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.909 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 3	$$3.33 \mathrm{ms} \pm 18.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.442 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

policy_resolution_small

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: high, policies: 52	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 20.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.99 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.01 \mathrm{ms} \pm 16.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.579 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: empty, selectivity: medium, policies: 25	$$3.24 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.75 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: high, policies: 94	$$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 21.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.472 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.31 \mathrm{ms} \pm 19.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.643 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: seeded, selectivity: medium, policies: 26	$$3.65 \mathrm{ms} \pm 22.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.97 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: high, policies: 66	$$3.79 \mathrm{ms} \pm 24.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.10 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: low, policies: 1	$$3.40 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
resolve_policies_for_actor	user: system, selectivity: medium, policies: 29	$$3.76 \mathrm{ms} \pm 23.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.87 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_complete

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id;one_depth	1 entities	$$44.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 225 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.25 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	10 entities	$$84.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 446 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}3.30 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	25 entities	$$50.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 325 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.54 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	5 entities	$$52.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.23 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;one_depth	50 entities	$$61.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 438 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.05 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	1 entities	$$46.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 232 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.809 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	10 entities	$$433 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.06 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}2.98 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	25 entities	$$95.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 463 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{lightgreen}-5.805 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	5 entities	$$92.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 370 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.73 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;two_depth	50 entities	$$294 \mathrm{ms} \pm 964 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.495 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	1 entities	$$16.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 84.9 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.91 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	10 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 91.5 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.544 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	25 entities	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 106 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.059 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	5 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 87.0 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.895 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id;zero_depth	50 entities	$$19.9 \mathrm{ms} \pm 120 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.230 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

read_scaling_linkless

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	1 entities	$$16.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 83.7 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.629 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10 entities	$$16.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 88.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.850 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	100 entities	$$16.4 \mathrm{ms} \pm 82.4 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.260 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	1000 entities	$$17.0 \mathrm{ms} \pm 98.2 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.955 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	10000 entities	$$24.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 169 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.419 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/block/v/1`	$$33.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 397 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.38 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/book/v/1`	$$32.1 \mathrm{ms} \pm 352 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.908 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/building/v/1`	$$32.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 340 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.00 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/organization/v/1`	$$33.7 \mathrm{ms} \pm 305 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}6.29 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/page/v/2`	$$32.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 309 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.385 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/person/v/1`	$$32.8 \mathrm{ms} \pm 298 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.846 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/playlist/v/1`	$$33.2 \mathrm{ms} \pm 315 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.195 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/song/v/1`	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-3.330 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
entity_by_id	entity type ID: `https://blockprotocol.org/@alice/types/entity-type/uk-address/v/1`	$$32.3 \mathrm{ms} \pm 280 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.748 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_entity_type

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
get_entity_type_by_id	Account ID: `bf5a9ef5-dc3b-43cf-a291-6210c0321eba`	$$9.19 \mathrm{ms} \pm 56.6 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-2.834 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

representative_read_multiple_entities

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$97.6 \mathrm{ms} \pm 525 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.478 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$152 \mathrm{ms} \pm 710 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.679 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$103 \mathrm{ms} \pm 515 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.769 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 550 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.641 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$121 \mathrm{ms} \pm 573 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-1.035 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
entity_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$130 \mathrm{ms} \pm 651 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.22 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=0	0	$$93.5 \mathrm{ms} \pm 490 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}2.47 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=255	1,resolve_depths=inherit:1;values:255;properties:255;links:127;link_dests:126;type:true	$$125 \mathrm{ms} \pm 534 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.52 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:0;link_dests:0;type:false	$$100 \mathrm{ms} \pm 687 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}1.21 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:0;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$108 \mathrm{ms} \pm 530 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.109 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:0;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 636 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}0.939 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$
link_by_source_by_property	traversal_paths=2	1,resolve_depths=inherit:0;values:2;properties:2;links:1;link_dests:0;type:true	$$111 \mathrm{ms} \pm 595 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}-0.117 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$

scenarios

Function	Value	Mean	Flame graphs
full_test	query-limited	$$142 \mathrm{ms} \pm 539 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{gray}4.32 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
full_test	query-unlimited	$$141 \mathrm{ms} \pm 574 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}5.06 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-limited	$$127 \mathrm{ms} \pm 592 \mathrm{μs}\left({\color{red}18.4 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph
linked_queries	query-unlimited	$$585 \mathrm{ms} \pm 1.12 \mathrm{ms}\left({\color{gray}-4.942 \mathrm{\%}}\right) $$	Flame Graph

BE-311: Implement entity deletion with multi-level scoping and proven…

f771004

…ance

graphite-app bot assigned TimDiekmann Feb 27, 2026

github-actions bot added area/deps Relates to third-party dependencies (area) area/libs Relates to first-party libraries/crates/packages (area) type/eng > backend Owned by the @backend team area/tests New or updated tests labels Feb 27, 2026

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign-tokens February 27, 2026 15:02 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hashdotdesign February 27, 2026 15:03 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 27, 2026 15:03 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash February 27, 2026 15:04 Failure

augmentcode bot reviewed Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@local/graph/postgres-store/src/store/postgres/knowledge/entity/delete.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

libs/@local/graph/postgres-store/tests/deletion/purge.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

cursor bot reviewed Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 27, 2026 16:12 View deployment

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash February 27, 2026 16:18 Failure

cursor bot reviewed Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@local/graph/api/openapi/openapi.json Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

TimDiekmann added 2 commits February 27, 2026 17:52

Format schema property definitions in inferred entity provenance rust

23db01a

code

vercel bot had a problem deploying to Preview – hash February 27, 2026 16:55 Failure

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 27, 2026 16:57 View deployment

cursor bot reviewed Feb 27, 2026

View reviewed changes

libs/@blockprotocol/type-system/rust/src/knowledge/entity/provenance.rs Show resolved Hide resolved

BE-311: Fix doc links to private methods on impl block

c8839ae

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 28, 2026 12:33 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 28, 2026 12:43 View deployment

BE-311: Fix broken intra-doc link to ToSchema

f29dda8

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 28, 2026 12:47 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 28, 2026 12:57 View deployment

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 28, 2026 13:05 View deployment

TimDiekmann added 2 commits February 28, 2026 14:46

Update package.json

36e46b0

Update yarn.lock

46a1015

vercel bot temporarily deployed to Preview – petrinaut February 28, 2026 13:49 Inactive

vercel bot deployed to Preview – hash February 28, 2026 14:01 View deployment

graphite-app bot requested review from a team February 28, 2026 18:46

Conversation

TimDiekmann commented Feb 27, 2026

🌟 What is the purpose of this PR?

🔗 Related links

🔍 What does this change?

Core API

Concurrency safety

Error variants

Pre-Merge Checklist 🚀

🚢 Has this modified a publishable library?

📜 Does this require a change to the docs?

🕸️ Does this require a change to the Turbo Graph?

🛡 What tests cover this?

❓ How to test this?

🐾 Next steps

Uh oh!

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

PR Summary

Uh oh!

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Codecov Report

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot commented Feb 27, 2026

Uh oh!

augmentcode bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 27, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Merging this PR will not alter performance

Footnotes

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

cursor bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions bot commented Feb 28, 2026

Benchmark results

@rust/hash-graph-benches – Integrations

policy_resolution_large

policy_resolution_medium

policy_resolution_none

policy_resolution_small

read_scaling_complete

read_scaling_linkless

representative_read_entity

representative_read_entity_type

representative_read_multiple_entities

scenarios

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

1 participant

vercel bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

cursor bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codecov bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading

codspeed-hq bot commented Feb 27, 2026 •

edited

Loading