-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
Locally Simply Connected Initial PR #1659
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
26df181
7a02915
0f7c6a2
16e0009
c5fb9cc
9663054
6341749
219dc2d
4da0912
db4c6dd
4dcea09
cf4b729
11987d6
b4bc5b6
deb8490
6842f4e
efd3899
093cd04
7a7dbf6
cac8d3a
42d4590
36fb101
0840955
5788ad4
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ | ||||||
| --- | ||||||
| uid: P000230 | ||||||
| name: Locally simply connected | ||||||
| refs: | ||||||
| - wikipedia: Locally simply connected space | ||||||
| name: Locally simply connected space on Wikipedia | ||||||
|
Comment on lines
+5
to
+6
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Wikipedia does not seem very authoritative in this case. The article would need to be "fixed" anyway. But if we want to keep it, can you move it to the end of the list of references? |
||||||
| - mr: 2766102 | ||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
zb is preferable if available, because more accessible (it's in our guidelines now) |
||||||
| name: Introduction to topological manifolds (Lee) | ||||||
| - zb: "0951.54001" | ||||||
| name: Topology (Munkres) | ||||||
| - mo: 487326 | ||||||
| name: 'Definition of locally simply connected space' | ||||||
| --- | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| $X$ admits a basis of open sets which are {P200}. | ||||||
|
|
||||||
| Equivalently, for every $x \in X$ and each neighborhood $N$ of $x$ in $X$, there is a simply connected open neighborhood $U$ of $x$ contained in $N$. | ||||||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
simpler, more concise |
||||||
|
|
||||||
| Defined on page 298 of {{mr:2766102}}, page 495 of {{zb:0951.54001}} and as property $P_1$ of {{mo:487326}}. | ||||||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: P000231 | ||
| name: Weakly locally simply connected | ||
| refs: | ||
| - zb: "0063.00842" | ||
| name: Theory of Lie groups. I (Chevalley) | ||
| - mo: 487326 | ||
| name: 'Definition of locally simply connected space' | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Every point of $X$ has a neighborhood which is {P200}. | ||
|
|
||
| Defined as "locally simply connected" on page 54 of {{zb:0063.00842}} and as property $P_4$ of {{mo:487326}}. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: P000232 | ||
| name: $LC^1$ | ||
| aliases: | ||
| - Locally simply connected | ||
| refs: | ||
| - zb: "0153.52905" | ||
| name: Theory of retracts (Borsuk) | ||
| - mo: 487326 | ||
| name: 'Definition of locally simply connected space' | ||
| - mathse: 5126526 | ||
| name: Is Borsuk's definition of $LC^1$ equivalent to this formulation of 'locally simply connected' ($P_{10}$)? | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| $X$ is locally $0$-connected and locally $1$-connected, as in {{zb:0153.52905}}. | ||
| A space $X$ is locally $n$-connected if for every $x \in X$ and each neighborhood $N$ of $x$ in $X$, there is a neighborhood $U$ of $x$ contained in $N$ such that every map $S^n \to N$ with values in $U$ is null-homotopic in $N$. | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. null-homotopic relatve what? Maybe it doesnt matter (not sure about conjugacy classes in higher homotopy groups)
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is a very important comment. Free spheres are not necessarily conjugacy classes of based spheres at all.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. There is no relative to anything here. Saying "null-homotopic in
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd like a mention of "(without basepoint)" or something similar somewhere in there. I'm no expert, but when I see "n-connected", it's always about homotopies with basepoints. Having "locally n-connected" involve unbased homotopies was jarring to me. |
||
|
|
||
| Equivalently, for every $x \in X$ and each neighborhood $N$ of $x$ in $X$, there is a path-connected neighborhood $U$ of $x$ contained in $N$ such that every loop in $U$ is null-homotopic in $N$. See {{mathse:5126526}}. | ||
|
|
||
| This property is part of a hierarchy of $LC^n$ properties which includes {P42} as $LC^0$. | ||
| Defined on page 54 of {{zb:0153.52905}} and as property $P_{10}$ of {{mo:487326}}. | ||
|
|
||
| ---- | ||
| #### Meta-properties | ||
| - This property is preserved by retractions. | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Doesnt this metaproperty also hold for the other 2 versions?
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Also metaproperties : For all three:
For locally simply connected and lc1:
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Here Moishe Kohan mentions that ANRs need not have P230. One of the ANRs he mentions is the one-point compactification of the Whitehead manifold, There's also the other example shared by Melikhov here which I haven't tried to understand but which seems relevant. Most relevant actually is Theorem 3 on page 143 of Armentrout's paper which says "THEOREM 3. The space X is not strongly locally simply connected.", and Lemma 10, which says, "LEMMA 10. Summarizing, Armentrout's paper seems to directly show P230 is not preserved by retractions. I'll have to look more for a paper about P231, but I strongly suspect it is not either. Either way, the question seems likely to be highly non-trivial so let's not hold this up for that.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. nice. (very) non easy metaproperties are better added in a later PR anyways. :)
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The property of being locally homotopically trivial over
I proved that LC^1 is preserved by finite products, and these are good suggestions, but if you don't mind I'd prefer we add those in next PR. It takes me longer than you might think to make minor modifications, and I'm really supposed to be working on other things anyway.
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. sure, no hurry :)
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. all nice comments, unfortunately later on they will get "lost" when commenting on particular lines of a file. But great comments! |
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -3,11 +3,11 @@ uid: T000847 | |
| if: | ||
| P000122: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000229: true | ||
| P000230: true | ||
| refs: | ||
| - zb: "0951.54001" | ||
| name: Topology (Munkres) | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| For $x \in X$ pick a neighborhood $U$ homeomorphic to $\mathbb{R}^n$. | ||
| Then $\pi_1(U,x)$ is trivial (see Example 1 on page 331 of {{zb:0951.54001}}). | ||
| A locally Euclidean space admits a basis of Euclidean open balls. | ||
| For a Euclidean open ball $U$ and $x \in U$, $\pi_1(U,x)$ is trivial (see Example 1 on page 331 of {{zb:0951.54001}}). | ||
|
Collaborator
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I just noticed that in theory we would also need to show a euclidean ball is path connected (we also dont mention this currently), but maybe its trivial enough to omit this.
Collaborator
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. That's a good point. I can say instead that R^n is contractible then leave it at that. |
||
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000853 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000230: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000231: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Immediate from the definitions. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000854 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000230: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000232: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Immediate from the equivalent characterizations of each property. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000855 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000231: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000229: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Immediate from the definitions. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000856 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000232: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000229: true | ||
| refs: | ||
| - mathse: 4044399 | ||
| name: Characterizing simply connected spaces | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| Let $x \in X$. By {P232}, there exists a path-connected neighborhood $U$ of $x$ such that every | ||
| loop $ S^1 \to X$ loop with image in $U$ is null-homotopic. Let $\sigma$ be a loop in $U$ based at $x$. | ||
| Choose a null-homotopy $F : S^1 \times [0, 1] \to X$ from $\sigma$ to a constant loop. Apply the arguments | ||
| $(4) \Rightarrow (5)$ and $(5) \Rightarrow (1)$ from {{mathse:4044399}} to $F$ in order to construct a | ||
| basepoint preserving null-homotopy of $\sigma$ to the constant loop at $x$. | ||
| Then {P229} follows. |
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
|---|---|---|
| @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ | ||
| --- | ||
| uid: T000857 | ||
| if: | ||
| P000232: true | ||
| then: | ||
| P000042: true | ||
| --- | ||
|
|
||
| $LC^1$ implies $LC^0$ by definition. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Alias "strongly locally simply connected"
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'll refer to one of Armentrout's papers since he seems to have written a lot on this property and explicitly used that name.
This one's good because it uses it in the title: Armentrout, BING'S DOGBONE SPACE IS NOT STRONGLY LOCALLY SIMPLY CONNECTED
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes I agree, I meant add "strongly locally simply connected" as alias and keep this