Skip to content

Conversation

@stevepiercy
Copy link
Contributor

@stevepiercy stevepiercy commented Dec 24, 2025

This pull request clarifies the definition of native and implicit namespace packages as synonyms, and adds a glossary term for them.

From a discussion in Discord at https://discord.com/channels/935215565872693329/935215566334079058/1451178701956976853, by an initially very confused reader who's relatively new to the terminology.

Feedback welcome. Thank you for your consideration.


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://python-packaging-user-guide--1979.org.readthedocs.build/en/1979/

Co-authored-by: Adam Turner <9087854+AA-Turner@users.noreply.github.com>
.. note::

:term:`Native namespace <Native Namespace Package>` and
:term:`implicit namespace <Implicit Namespace Package>` packages are two
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this should say either

native and implicit namespace packages

or

native namespace packages and implicit namespace packages

but not use two words out of the three

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants