Skip to content

Updated dates#2796

Open
Ko496-glitch wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Ko496-glitch:update-date-check-march-2026
Open

Updated dates#2796
Ko496-glitch wants to merge 1 commit intorust-lang:mainfrom
Ko496-glitch:update-date-check-march-2026

Conversation

@Ko496-glitch
Copy link

Updated 'date-checlk: ' dates in following documents

  1. src/backend/updating-llvm.md
  2. src/borrow-check/region-inference/member-constraints.md
  3. src/diagnostics/error-codes.md
  4. src/diagnostics/lintstore.md

Signed off by: ko496

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Mar 14, 2026

Thanks for the PR. If you have write access, feel free to merge this PR if it does not need reviews. You can request a review using r? rustc-dev-guide or r? <username>.

@rustbot rustbot added the S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content label Mar 14, 2026
@Ko496-glitch
Copy link
Author

r? rustc-dev-guide

@reddevilmidzy
Copy link
Member

In my opinion, it would be meaningless to just change the date without changing the content. If there is a change in the content, please update the date then

@tshepang tshepang mentioned this pull request Mar 16, 2026
35 tasks
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
# Updating LLVM

<!-- date-check: Aug 2024 -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe this date-check is left over from when this used to hard-code LLVM versions. There's nothing here anymore that's version specific so I think we can just remove this date-check altogether rather than updating it.


## New LLVM Release Updates

<!-- date-check: Jul 2023 -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ditto, I think we can remove this.

> - [LLVM 17](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/115959)
> - [LLVM 18](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/120055)
> - [LLVM 19](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/127513)
> - [LLVM 20](https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/pull/135763)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could you add a link to rust-lang/rust#143684 and rust-lang/rust#150722 here please?

Comment on lines 92 to 100
## Choices are always lifetime parameters

At present, the "choice" regions from a member constraint are always lifetime
parameters from the current function. As of <!-- date-check --> October 2021,
parameters from the current function. As of <!-- date-check --> March 2026,
this falls out from the placement of impl Trait, though in the future it may not
be the case. We take some advantage of this fact, as it simplifies the current
code. In particular, we don't have to consider a case like `'0 member of ['1,
'static]`, in which the value of both `'0` and `'1` are being inferred and hence
changing. See [rust-lang/rust#61773][#61773] for more information.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@BoxyUwU do you happen to know if this is still true?

Comment on lines -24 to 25
As of <!-- date-check --> Aug 2022,
As of <!-- date-check --> March 2026,
we lint against direct declarations without the use of the macro.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

have you verified this is still true?

@jyn514
Copy link
Member

jyn514 commented Mar 16, 2026

In my opinion, it would be meaningless to just change the date without changing the content. If there is a change in the content, please update the date then

@reddevilmidzy this isn't how date-check works, see https://rustc-dev-guide.rust-lang.org/contributing.html#contributing-to-rustc-dev-guide

@jyn514 jyn514 added S-waiting-on-author Status: this PR is waiting for additional action by the OP and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: this PR is waiting for a reviewer to verify its content labels Mar 16, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

S-waiting-on-author Status: this PR is waiting for additional action by the OP

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants