ROX-20016: Processes listening on ports test fix ci

[JoukoVirtanen]

Description

The "ProcessesListeningOnPortsTest / Verify networking endpoints with processes appear in API at the deployment level" is flaky. When it fails the test pod has the following error

2026/02/16 02:33:07 socat[1] N listening on AF=2 0.0.0.0:8080
2026/02/16 02:33:07 socat[2] E bind(5, {AF=2 0.0.0.0:80}, 16): Permission denied
2026/02/16 02:33:07 socat[2] N exit(1)
2026/02/16 02:33:07 socat[1] N childdied(): handling signal 17

To resolve this flake a none privileged port, 8079, will be used instead of the current privileged port.

There are alternatives that can be implemented later. The socat command could be run with the root user. Then the port could be changed back to 80.

User-facing documentation

• CHANGELOG.md is updated OR update is not needed
• documentation PR is created and is linked above OR is not needed

Testing and quality

• the change is production ready: the change is GA, or otherwise the functionality is gated by a feature flag
• CI results are inspected

Automated testing

• added unit tests
• added e2e tests
• added regression tests
• added compatibility tests
• modified existing tests

How I validated my change

CI is sufficient.

[rhacs-bot]

Images are ready for the commit at 4fb25ec.

To use with deploy scripts, first export MAIN_IMAGE_TAG=4.11.x-95-g4fb25ec05e.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 49.51%. Comparing base (dba6a17) to head (4fb25ec).
⚠️ Report is 40 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #19067      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   49.52%   49.51%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files        2666     2670       +4     
  Lines      201181   201549     +368     
==========================================
+ Hits        99629    99802     +173     
- Misses      94114    94294     +180     
- Partials     7438     7453      +15     

Flag	Coverage Δ
go-unit-tests	49.51% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[JoukoVirtanen]

/test gke-qa-e2e-tests