Conversation
Collaborator
|
Thanks, will check it out and merge |
Collaborator
|
yes, seems you are right |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem where the occupations in
t_updid not matchdet_upin the 1-1 excitation elements.Originally, the 1-0 branch had the following bit of code
which would assign
t_upfor the 1-0 branch as needed, i.e., when |Hki*ci|>eps and when the singly-excited determinant was not contained in the variational wave function.However,
t_upneeds to be correctly assigned also for the later 1-1 branch, which would not always happen.Additionally, the threads are not guaranteed to join in order, so the
compute_enpt2_thread_condensenow happens only after all threads have joined.