Skip to content

seq: Avoid allocating arbitrarily large bigints (cap set to 10^{4932}…#11254

Open
aweinstock314 wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
Zellic:seq-bound-bigints
Open

seq: Avoid allocating arbitrarily large bigints (cap set to 10^{4932}…#11254
aweinstock314 wants to merge 1 commit intouutils:mainfrom
Zellic:seq-bound-bigints

Conversation

@aweinstock314
Copy link
Contributor

… for GNU compatibility).

seq: Avoid panicing on decimals smaller than 10^{-65535}.

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

GNU test failed: tests/rm/isatty. tests/rm/isatty is passing on 'main'. Maybe you have to rebase?
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/dd/no-allocate is now being skipped but was previously passing.

@codspeed-hq
Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Mar 9, 2026

Merging this PR will improve performance by ×33

⚡ 2 improved benchmarks
✅ 296 untouched benchmarks
⏩ 48 skipped benchmarks1

Performance Changes

Mode Benchmark BASE HEAD Efficiency
Memory seq_large_integers 52.8 KB 7.7 KB ×6.9
Simulation seq_large_integers 2,040.8 µs 61.7 µs ×33

Comparing Zellic:seq-bound-bigints (a0d8d12) with main (53200b3)

Open in CodSpeed

Footnotes

  1. 48 benchmarks were skipped, so the baseline results were used instead. If they were deleted from the codebase, click here and archive them to remove them from the performance reports.

… for GNU compatibility).

seq: Avoid panicing on decimals smaller than 10^{-65535}.
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 9, 2026

GNU testsuite comparison:

Skipping an intermittent issue tests/date/resolution (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/pr/bounded-memory (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Skipping an intermittent issue tests/tty/tty-eof (passes in this run but fails in the 'main' branch)
Note: The gnu test tests/printf/printf-surprise is now being skipped but was previously passing.

@oech3
Copy link
Contributor

oech3 commented Mar 9, 2026

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants